ACLU, 16 groups ask speaker hopefuls for greater openness, legislative reforms, term limits

The chamber of the Maryland House of Delegates. Governor’s Office photo

By Len Lazarick

The ACLU, Common Cause and 15 other progressive groups and unions are asking the candidates for speaker of the House of Delegates to answer a questionnaire that commits them to greater openness in the legislative process and to term limits for the speaker and committee chairs.

The twelve-part questionnaire raises many of the issues that have long troubled witnesses, advocates, lobbyists, and journalists about how the legislature operates.

“We need to know where House Speaker candidates stand on good governance issues because they will shape the direction of the state for decades to come,” said Dana Vickers Shelley, executive director of the ACLU of Maryland. “Marylanders deserve and rightly demand that legislators demystify the political process and allow for greater civic engagement. Moreover, decentralization of power, diversity, and inclusion affords our communities more robust and representative debate on important issues.”

There are currently three announced candidates to succeed Speaker Michael Busch who died April 7. They are Democratic Dels. Adrienne Jones, Balto. County, speaker pro-tem; Dereck Davis, Prince George’s, chair of the Economic Matters Committee; and Maggie McIntosh, Baltimore, chair of the Appropriations Committee.

They are asked to respond by April 24. The vote on the new speaker is tentatively set for a special session of the House of Delegates which Gov. Larry Hogan has not yet called.

Video of committee voting sessions  

Among its more controversial issues, the questionnaire asks: “Will you require committee voting sessions be simultaneously broadcast, either online or outside the hearing room?”

While almost all hearings are now live streamed and archived, committee work sessions and voting sessions are not — often the most crucial part of the legislative process where bills are amended or killed.

The questionnaire also asks for recorded votes on committee amendments. Currently, only the final vote on bills is recorded on paper, which is turned into a PDF available online.

The questionnaire also asks for a reform of one of the most frustrating parts of the legislative process — the order in which bills are taken up at hearings. Currently, the hearing schedule lists bills in numeric order, and it is generally only at the beginning of the hearings that the committee chair announces the order in which bills will actually be heard.

Sometimes witnesses wait all afternoon or into the evening to testify on legislation that may be listed first on the hearing schedule.

“Will you require that committee chairs make reasonable efforts to publish a tentative order of bill hearings 24 hours in advance?” the questionnaire asks the speaker candidates.

The questionnaire does not ask the prospective speakers if they will fulfill the commitment made by Speaker Busch in January to have video streaming of floor sessions next year.

Reforming the legislative process

The next speaker is also asked to reform more elements of the legislative process, such as stricter enforcement of the single-subject rule for legislation. They are also asked to decentralize the leadership of the House.

“What is your vision for more diverse and inclusive leadership in the House of Delegates and how do you intend to effectuate that vision?” the coalition asks.

There is also mention of involving members of the standing committees in choosing the chairs and vice chairs.

Currently, the speaker — and the Senate president as well — have immense powers to appoint not only all the leadership positions, but all the members of the committees, including the Republicans. The questionnaire makes no mention of partisan diversity.

And finally, in seeking to replace the longest-serving speaker in Maryland history, who wielded the gavel for over 16 years, the questionnaire asks: “If elected to Speaker of the House, will you commit to stepping down from your position in 8 years or fewer? Would you support limiting the tenure of committee chairs to 8 years? If not, please explain your reasoning.”

Here is a link to the full press release from the ACLU, including statements from the NAACP.

Here is the list of the coalition members:


ACLU of Maryland

Advocates for Children and Youth

CASA de Maryland

Common Cause Maryland

FreeState Justice

Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle

Inter-Faith Action for Human Rights

Life After Release

Maryland Alliance for Justice Reform

Maryland Justice Project

Maryland Prisoners’ Rights Coalition

NAACP—Maryland State Conference

NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland

Out for Justice

SEIU Local 500

Showing Up for Racial Justice (SURJ) Baltimore