One on behalf of Sen. Ulysses Currie by Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown seems to stretch the legislative record like a rubber band. Currie, 76, is facing a serious challenge for reelection to a sixth term in the Democratic primary from Del. Melony Griffith. Brown, now running for governor. had represented the same District 25 of Prince George’s County in the House of Delegates before he was elected lieutenant governor.
Currie had been censured by the Senate in 2012 for failing to disclose he took money as a consultant to help a supermarket with state agencies. These actions had led to a federal indictment and trial in which his attorneys used the “too dumb to be corrupt” defense to win an acquittal. As part of the censure, he was stripped of all leadership positions, including the chairmanship of the Budget and Taxation Committee.
The brochure shows a picture of Brown saying:
“I know Ulysses Currie. He was a leader in our efforts to raise the minimum wage. When we needed him to — HE DELIVERED.”
Inside the brochure, there’s a picture of Brown and Currie, and it says. “When Lieutenant Governor Anthony Brown needed help to raise the minimum wage, he turned to Senator Ulysses Currie.”
Only problem is that Currie had no leadership role in the passage of the minimum wage hike, other than voting for its final passage. It was an O’Malley administration bill, and Currie was one of 22 co-sponsors listed in alphabetical order on the Senate version.
On top of that, it was the House bill, HB295, that actually was enacted with the heavy lifting done by the House Economic Matters Committee, and its chair, Del. Dereck Davis, who also represents District 25 and is running on a ticket with Currie. In the Senate, the bill was worked on by the Senate Finance Committee on which Currie does not serve.
If you see other campaign mailers or candidates emails that stretch the truth, or abandon it altogether, please contact Len@MarylandReporter.com.
MarylandReporter.com is a daily news website produced by journalists committed to making state government as open, transparent, accountable and responsive as possible – in deed, not just in promise. We believe the people who pay for this government are entitled to have their money spent in an efficient and effective way, and that they are entitled to keep as much of their hard-earned dollars as they possibly can.