As a long-term supporter of Bernie Sanders, I was startled to receive an unexpected email from the HRC Campaign in October, 2015, thanking me for becoming a member of “Hillary for America.” I never would do such a thing and actually, this quite upset me. Immediately, I detected something wasn’t quite right. I wrote them back three times and actually asked them if they were stealing Bernie’s voter info.
This was long before the public knew anything about a data breach. I replied that I would be informing the media about this and did in fact write a couple media outlets. I was quite upset about the fact they had my info; I asked them to never contact me again. The tone of my email meant business. I told them if I ever found my info on any petition I would sue.Now, of course, with all the purging of the voter rolls, and the knowledge of the DNC data breach, it has become glaringly obvious just exactly WHO accessed that data breach, and it wasn’t Bernie’s campaign after all!
I did check to see if my voter info was intact since I had just switched to Democrat from a lifelong Independent so I could vote for Bernie Sanders. and it was listed correctly. Now I think about the letter and my threat and wonder if my voter info was left intact because of it?
From a friend via BBC the night after the NY Primary:
The reasons for this “loss” are quite simple. In Nov. and Dec. last year the Dem Party database firewall went down on 3 occasions. A possible explanation: on the last occurrence, a former Clinton employee who was ostensibly placed within the Sanders Campaign staff as manager of their own database within the Dem Party overall voter database, “downloaded” a portion of Clinton’s voter database.
This “inside job” created a false story that hid the actions of the Clinton Campaign, who in all likelihood accessed the complete Sander’s voter database and used that as a basis to organize a purge of Sander’s voters from Ohio, Arizona, NY (as well as more states to come and past).
Also note that tonight’s poll results, just like Ohio and Arizona are being reported as static % voting patterns for Clinton over Sanders with a 21% lead. This is an impossibility tonight just as it was in the previous two “odd” elections where exit polling (usually highly accurate) shows a small vote differential of 3-6%.
In truth, the states different regions and precincts votes in very different patterns than the static 21% being shown.
In some Clinton wins by 60-40, in others Bernie won 60-40…and larger variable % differences have already been individually reported. If those were being accurately reported in the major media counts, the % difference between the candidates would be jumping around dramatically.
The very static nature of the % the media is reporting is a definitive sign of collusion between the DNC/Clinton camps and those major media news outlets.
Why do I say this? I have been an election observer in 4 major, highly disputed elections in Africa over the last 15 years. In each one of these the US State Dept, CIA, EU observer teams, UN observer teams and even local African NGO observer teams looked at this exact relationship between poll reporting percentage in the government controlled or ruling party controlled media as a sign of massive vote fraud.
This single issue was raised in each of those elections where I was an observer and was used by Hillary Clinton’s own State Dept as an excuse to declare that election in question as “not free and fair” or as an out right fraud against the people of that country. She knows the playbook well…she just defrauded the people if NY and the US with this same strategy here, with the collusion of the US major media.” – John Poundstone
From Investigative Reporter, Greg Palast: “Buckle up, America. The voting demolition derby that was the New York primary on Tuesday was merely the crash test for the coming voting wreckage in November: a carefully planned pile up… As I look upon the wreckage that was the New York primary, I see the prelude, the test run, for the catastrophic failure, the well-planned failure, of the voting system in November. The purges and votes “spoiled”–the votes not counted—not the voters, may well elect our President. Hopefully, the Journal can soon endorse Sanders for the nomination.”