There are things I do that some people consider a complete waste of time. Writing, for instance. But that’s usually a charge from people who don’t agree with my political or social views.
Then there are the things I consider a complete waste of time — two afternoons to be exact. Specifically, I watched Atlas Shrugged, both parts. It’s hard to stay awake through both movies, plus I paused long enough to watch hour-long music videos, like the making of Frank Zappa’s two stellar albums, Apostrophe and Over-Nite Sensation and the making of Steely Dan’s Aja. Both are highly recommended and do not constitute a waste of time.
If you are the least bit educated, or at least took some mildly advanced literature classes in high school, there’s a good chance you had to read either Atlas Shrugged or The Fountainhead. It’s a literary rite of passage, almost as gruesome as cleaning your first deer carcass.
Some might call it punishment, but people say that about Milton, Chaucer and Shakespeare, so it’s all a matter of taste.
Remember in college, how proud you were to be lugging around that soft cover copy of James Joyce’s Ulysses? “That’s right mofos, I’m reading Ulysses and I understand it!”
Well, most people didn’t actually read Ulysses let alone understand it, other than what was cribbed from the Cliff’s Notes version. For those who have never encountered the book, it is very foreboding. Its word count is roughly 265,000 words and, believe it or not, Joyce used roughly 32,000 different words, making it literally the wordiest book ever written.
So no, many people who claim to have read Ulysses didn’t. They just glommed onto the Cliff’s Notes and caught up with it that way. But we loved to have a copy visibly on our person as we walked to and fro across the campus.
Unless of course you opted for that English class in which the only literature you studied for a semester was one book and you happened to choose Ulysses. You could have also chosen Shakespeare’s Henry V, which is a play not a novel, but still a wonderful read, or you could have chosen the poem Paradise Lost by Milton.
Or you could choose what some people did and do all three. Now that’s some intellectual masochism.
But, getting back to Atlas Shrugged, no one ever walked around campus with a copy of Ayn Rand’s most famous novel visibly tucked under the elbow for all to see. If you were in a literature class and it was on the reading list, well that was understandable. You have to read it for class, but you kept the book hidden in a backpack.
Ayn Rand’s “screw poor people and the Middle Class” philosophy is so offensive, who would want to brag that they were reading Atlas Shrugged? It comes out of your backpack when you’re looking around for a Snickers or a Trojan, and, “Yeah it’s on my reading list this semester.”
Lunch/sex partner: “Ugh! I actually just read the Cliff’s Notes. I still have it if you want it.”
Then we split the Snickers and had sex like deprived (or depraved) rabbits.
So it came as a complete shock to me there are people in this world that take Ayn Rand and her “Objectivist” philosophy seriously. In fact, Ayn Rand and her two books of note really didn’t pique my interest or attention again after that semester — for decades.
It’s embarrassing to admit it, but I never really dug into the deeper motivations of conservative-slash-Republican politicians or commentators until very recently, like last year when Paul Ryan was chosen to become Mitt Romney’s running mate. Yes, it is embarrassing to admit it never occurred to me where these people get their ideas.
We hear politicians and so-called conservatives talking on the news programs about St. Ronnie being their ultimate role model. On occasion they will mention economists, from Edmund Burke to Milton Friedman; the free market thinkers who put all their faith in a free market, unfettered by government intrusion (regulations) or taxes.
Once Paul Ryan was chosen to be Romney’s running mate and it was revealed he had much affection for Ayn Rand — and Atlas Shrugged was required reading in his office — all these Ayn Rand acolytes came pouring out of the woodwork spouting quotes from Atlas Shrugged and other Ayn Rand sources.
The author even spawned a real life “Flat Earth Society,’ called, quaintly enough, The Atlas Society.”
• Note: just Googled “Flat Earth Society” for yucks and there really is a society by that name dedicated to convincing everyone else the Earth is flat. Seriously.
Who knew, until it was revealed that Ryan spoke to the Atlas Society, glowingly, of Rand’s influence on his life. Maybe I heard of it before, but just didn’t remember because, who do you know that brags about being a fan of Rand or her books? Or at least bragged about it before Paul Ryan made Ayn Rand publicly known again? It would be a good bet most of those people had little knowledge of Rand and her books before Paul Ryan came along.
Of course, now that Ryan is back to being his miserable congressional self, the fervor over Ayn Rand has cooled considerably. She’s hardly mentioned anymore and quite frankly that worries me. I’ve watched the first two parts, two separate movies and there’s one more part needed to make the movie version of Atlas Shrugged complete. And then I can waste another afternoon.
Anyway, the book Atlas Shrugged has three main parts and the first two movies are fashioned into reasonable images of the first two parts — but with completely different actors for some reason.
Someone in the film industry needs to explain to the producers of these Atlas movies the details of sequels. You need to have the same actors play the principle characters throughout. Gives the series more continuity.
So now that a few people have watched the movies (we can assume it’s a few because right wing Tea Party groups had viewing parties last year in hopes it would help put Mitt and Paul over the top) we need to see the finish. Dagny crashing into John Galt’s Utopia (Galt’s Gulch) just isn’t going to cut it! We want to see what happens next!
Of course we could read the book, or at least the final third of it and see what happens; read Galt’s stirring speech. It’s very dramatic, dontcha know, given in the framework of a radio address. Galt wants to be heard, not seen because this is serious business. And it’s an entire chapter.
How many people really want to go through that? Not many. No, make Part Three and let us watch it, with that one chapter, the radio address, shortened. Really, when you boil down that entire chapter, it’s just not that interesting. It’s so melodramatic, like it was (poorly) written for the cinema. It’s the Objectivism philosophy writ large and in detail, it’s the “Greed is Good” philosophy on steroids. He’s like a terrible preacher on Sunday, droning on and on … “oh my god can someone tell him to shut the [heck] up all ready!”
Which brings up a good point: to really be an objectivist, you need to be an atheist. There’s no getting around that. People try to manipulate what is in the Bible to justify their greed and contempt for the poor, but as Stephen Colbert put it so succinctly, “If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn’t help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we’ve got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don’t want to do it.”
Getting back to the original dilemma, the producers of the Atlas Shrugged movies plan on making the third and final installment. The last information said it would be released in the summer of 2014. Apparently the hang up was financing. Gotta love the irony of that — Big Business’s wet dream being brought to life and nobody wants to finance it. Here’s the little secret: the movies are financial bombs and the third installment promises to be the same.
Well, the producers say someone wanted to finance it because they are going into pre-production. Good for them, I just hope I still have Netflix when it is released so I can watch it.
Atlas Shrugged uses this dystopian society to advocate the laissez-faire business environment and that without it our society will fall into ruin, especially if all the “producers” go on strike.
Ironically we are moving ever closer to that Rand-inspired view of society. Right now corporations and the über rich pay the lowest taxes ever since the introduction of the income tax. Some corporations, like General Electric, pay no income taxes and rich folk like Mitt Romney get away with paying 13 percent or less.
Their off shore holdings are protected by the tax code and banking regulations, thanks to representatives like Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer of New York. He isn’t the only one though. Wall Street and big business have plenty of lackeys in Congress. Schumer is the “go to guy” because he directly represents Wall Street and he recognizes that if he keeps that lobby happy he will get re-elected as often as he wishes to run.
Schumer is extremely progressive on other important issues, but when it comes to banking and the tax code, Schumer is in the pocket of big business and he’s the most powerful politician in that pocket.
Even before Schumer got into Congress the slide down to objectivism was in full gallop. It started with Ronald Reagan and the “trickle down” philosophy. Let the über rich become even richer and the fruits of their über wealth will trickle down to the rest of us.
Well, it hasn’t happened. At best we’ve been pissed on by the wealthy. The median income for the bottom 80% has either flat-lined or gone down. Earlier this year the Brookings Institute did a study that found income disparity was not just growing, but it was becoming permanent and could end upward social mobility.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that the top 1 percent earning households saw an increase of after-tax income of 275 percent. Their average tax rate has gone down 37 percent. Major corporations have had a similar boon and are at record levels of income and low taxes.
According to both the Brookings Institute and the CBO, the increasing income inequality is the reason programs like Social Security and Medicare are under funded.
Middle Class households saw their incomes increase just 40 percent while their tax burden has remained the same, with maybe a slight rise for some.
And yet if you want to believe what Ayn Rand and her acolytes are telling us, the rich and big corporations need even more of the same; and cut away the all those pesky regulations.
Regulations that are designed to keep our air and water clean; regulations that keep monopolies from grinding us into the dirt with their greed — well, those have mostly been removed, which is the primary reason we had the financial crisis of 2008. I know, some people want to blame it on the few people who bought homes they couldn’t afford — yadda, yadda, yadda.
Yep, for some barely explainable reason I want to see part three of the Atlas Shrugged saga. Maybe it’s my Catholic need for self-inflicted corporal penance; who knows? I watched the first two, now I need to see the last one. It was like the three Star Wars prequels. All three sucked, but after watching the first two I had to suffer through the third.
The reality is, we’re already living in an objectivist society and it’s killing us. We don’t really need to see what would happen if the Randians had their way — we’re seeing it happen now.
If you’re not part of that 1% but you’re voting for the people who make it possible for the income gap to continue growing, I gotta wonder why.
Theoretically anyone in America has the chance to become part of the 1 percent. We advertise ourselves as the land of opportunity, but the system is rigged to keep the top 1 percent pretty static, no new blood needed. And to do that the wealth of our nation needs to continue flowing up disproportionately to the financial elites. Which means advancing into the Middle Class is going to be just as difficult.
Upward mobility is becoming a bygone fruit of our economy, just as Rand and her worshippers hoped. The next step is to completely disenfranchise the poor and with Congressman Paul Ryan’s recent budgets, the GOP has proposed to do just that. “Why can’t all those poor people just live in poverty and be happy? Get rid of the minimum wage and we can hire more of them!”
For the followers of Rand, charity is not a moral duty or a virtue, so it’s got me wondering: who would be charitable enough to finance part three of the Atlas Shrugged trilogy? Gotta love the irony of that.