Reader claims 9/11 evidence supports 'energy devices' were pre-planted in World Trade Center's towers - Baltimore Post-ExaminerBaltimore Post-Examiner

Reader claims 9/11 evidence supports ‘energy devices’ were pre-planted in World Trade Center’s towers

To the editorial team,

Please accept my thanks to you as individuals and as a team, for printing the letter from Jim Deardorff, Research Professor emeritus at Oregon State University.
I have no connection to Mr Deardorff except for the fact that: My distant cousin, Vincent Princiotta FDNY, was killed in the collapse
of the South Tower at 9:59 am on the 11th. of September, 2011.
I have devoted much time and effort toward opening an examination of evidence, which has come to light since the “9/11 commission” was disbanded and the examination of the circumstances of the Crime of 9/11 was terminated.
It was on (Pearl Harbor Day) 3 years ago, in Japan, in Tokyo, at the request of several members of the Japanese government, that I  presented scientific evidence supporting the position that, there were additional energy devices, pre-planted in all 3 towers, before their total destruction occurred. Many, in the Japanese government, know that “Something is terribly wrong with the conspiracy theory  as provided to the World by the Bush administration”.
There is a volume of evidence supporting my position:
I present ONLY mathematical and Science Based material. I do not deal in “conspiracy theory.” I offer a challenge to any professional Architect, Engineer, or Physics teacher to debate this evidence.
I am available for further discussion, at any time.
Josef Princiotta

About the author



  1. Ian Fantom says:

    Five years ago it was very difficult to discuss this issue with people here in the UK, but now I find I can get people interested in it quite easily wherever I am, and no-one now thinks I’m crazy. A lot of people already know about it, and others are willing to hear. There’s a host of reasons that the official version of events was not possible, and there was no evidence that Osama bin Laden was behind it. The attack on Afghanistan was just lunacy. The mainstream media here has been rocked by scandals over the past several months – scandals that were formerly considered ‘conspiracy theory’. Yet they still remain silent on the impossibility of the official version of 9/11 (and 7/7 in London for that matter). We need to keep talking.

  2. elie says:

    Anyone who believes the official version of 9/11 is a fool and anyone that supports the 9/11 version is a traitor.


Leave a Comment

Comment Policy