Exposing the Fantasies of Green Energy - Baltimore Post-ExaminerBaltimore Post-Examiner

Exposing the Fantasies of Green Energy

(Extracted fromThat Should Still Be Us by Martin Sieff – Available from amazon.com)

President George W. Bush spent his eight years in office investing $13 billion in the development of alternative, sustainable, and clean energy technologies. He was especially big on corn ethanol and biomass. Billions went into wind and solar, too, just the way Thomas Friedman wanted.

Well, it turns out that Thomas Friedman was just as ignorant of engineering and the laws of chemistry as George W. Bush was.

Understand this: the technology to store solar energy on a gigawatt (billion watts of power) scale does not yet exist. If you want it to, invent it. But to imagine that it does exist is to indulge in science fiction.

The energy output of a single medium-size coal mine in Kentucky, Robert Bryce writes, is greater than the entire solar and wind energy output of the United States.

This is not because some mythical evil oil and nuclear corporation executives have plotted to sabotage virtuous “clean” and renewable wind and solar power. It is because wind and solar power do not work. Wind power never will. Solar power may fifty or a hundred years from now. But right now, to bet on wind and solar power to run the US economy is ludicrous. It is science fiction.

And to dream that hydroelectric power, biomass, or thermal power can make the American people energy-independent is worse than science fiction; it is a fairy tale for babies.

Hydrogen-powered cars are another absurdity that George W. Bush, a true Jonah among modern American presidents, madly embraced. Could our forty-third Chief Executive get nothing right?

Hydrogen is enormously flammable. Just click onto YouTube and watch the still-amazing footage of the German airship Hindenburg burn and crash when it was preparing to land at Lakehurst, N.J., on May 6, 1937. How many Americans do you think would want to risk that for their families every time they pulled into a gas station?

A credible, safe, cost-effective technology to use hydrogen for millions of cars at a time simply doesn’t exist. I don’t rule out the extreme possibility of one being developed, but to do so, and then to build the infrastructure to support it, would take decades. And we haven’t even got the technology yet.

Corn ethanol has probably reached and passed its own Hubbert’s Peak of possible maximum production. The prominent role of the Iowa caucuses in our long, drawn-out four-year presidential election ritual made them a third rail of American politics for decades. But in terms of simply chemistry and those magic figures of horsepower and watts, the units of measuring energy and power densities, corn ethanol was always simply absurd. It just doesn’t have the power density and the energy density to do the job. The iron laws of chemistry reject it.

At its peak, thanks to the benighted policies of George W. Bush—eagerly backed by just as many Democrats as Republicans—140 million tons of corn per year in the United States was turned into ethanol. This was far more expensive than using oil or coal. And now the Fracking Revolution has made it just absurd. But it had other dire consequences, too.

The corn ethanol boondoggle drove corn prices in the United States and around the world through the roof as well.

Experts say that as of 2010, the global economy fell short of its cereal/grain production needs by 50 million tons. That meant the United States was turning into expensive, unnecessary corn ethanol almost three times as much corn as the global shortfall. Scores of millions of people were suffering around the world because of the ethanol boondoggle.

Wind energy is never going to be more than a marginal energy source. That is because, quite simply, it depends on the wind. Electrical generating stations need to have regular, sustainable sources of energy their machinery can constantly rely upon. Storage batteries and technology to store wind energy do not exist. Hopefully, one day soon they will. But we simply cannot count on it.

Also, as Robert Bryce, the managing editor of Energy Tribune, has pointed out, the most effective wind turbines require major quantities of the extremely rare minerals or rare earth lithium and lanthanides. “That means mining,” Bryce writes in his book Power Hungry. “And China controls nearly all of the world’s existing mines that produce lanthanides.”

In other words, when Thomas Friedman is telling us to embrace a wind energy future, he is not making us less energy-dependent on the Middle East, he is making us far more energy-dependent on China.

Even in Germany, wind-generated electricity fell in both gross terms and as a percentage of total national energy consumption between 2008 and 2010. And this happened even though the Germans had invested big in this “good” and green technology and boosted their electrical generating capacity by 25 percent.

The figures were: 40,574 gigawatt-hours of electricity produced by wind-turbines in 2008, making 6.6 percent of total national power consumption; 38,639 gigawatt-hours produced in 2009, making 6.7 percent of national power consumption; and only 36,500 gigawatt-hours produced in 2010, making 6 percent of total power consumption.

Yet the installed capacity to produce wind power rose during the same time, from 23,836 megawatts in 2008 to 25,716 megawatts in 2009 to 36,500 megawatts in 2010. That represented a rise in wind-power-generating capacity of almost 33 percent, or a third in only three years.

Yet because of the uncertainty of the winds, more turbines actually generated less power. And that unpredictability is a headache for grid controllers. Usually gas power plants that never run at peak efficiency have to be built to supplement wind turbines on calm (or, ironically, incredibly windy) days. Indeed, Germany’s steel and aluminum industries are now in serious decline precisely because of the problems in turning to wind from old-fashioned, more reliable power sources in the past half-decade.


About the author

Martin Sieff

Martin Sieff is an editor at Sputnik, the Russian-owned news organization. He is the author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Middle East (2008), Gathering Storm (2014) and Cycles of Change: The Three Great Eras of American History and the Coming Crisis that will Lead to the Fourth (2014). Follow Martin on: @MartinSieff Contact the author.
COMMENT POLICY

2 Comments

  1. Len Rosen says:

    To suggest we are centuries away from developing storage technology to make renewables like wind and solar sustainable 24×7 is to be ignorant of what is happening in the field. There is no doubt that the potential energy in coal and other fossil fuels is significantly greater than the current capacity of renewables. At the same gigawatt capacity using solar exists in Germany today. In terms of storage I invite you to learn a lot more about the advances being made in the field. You can read about these on my 21st Century Tech blog at http://www.21stcentech.com. I think you will revise your forecast. Some final words, burning fossil fuels that add CO2 to the atmosphere is a prescription for further damaging of our environment with no idea of the consequences. Creating clean coal technology is more a pipe dream than sustainable renewables providing continuous power in 100s of gigawatts. And carbon sequestration remains so full of unknowns that we haven’t even thought of the questions yet or dreamed up the scenarios for creating stable mitigation technology.

    Reply
  2. geofly says:

    Why does it seem like the author of this article is being paid by the Coal Industry? “The energy output of a single medium-size coal mine in Kentucky is greater than the entire solar and wind energy output of the United States.” ?? Huhh? This is pure BS and a bogus statement with mixed-up facts designed to mislead. A coal mine (any coal mine) is limited in the amount of coal it has. Once it’s gone…..well, it’s gone. The energy density in a lump of coal may be high but it’s energy potential is far lower than even a brief breeze through a large wind turbine. And when that lump is burnt and done for, the wind turbine can still continue creating energy perhaps for 25 years or more before it needs to be replaced. Same thing for Solar. Sieff is right about the Corn Ethanol boondoggle though totally misinformed about Energy Storage technology and the energy grid as a whole. Why even worry about storing the Energy produced from Wind and Solar when the Peak Wind and Solar production occurs in sync with Peak usage and demand? Instead utilize that energy to reduce the burning of coal and gas at Peak. The “Grid” then becomes your storage. This is not something like Star Wars, this is today’s technology. The Utilities just need some help in incentives in configuring their systems to make it work right. We’ll still need coal, oil and gas for a while but the more we invest in Alternatives, the faster we’ll get to lower cost and greater efficiency and just like the myriad of products (computers, cell phones, solar cells, etc..) that came out of the Space Program, we’ll own the Tech and sell it to the rest of the world.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy

HOME / ABOUT / CONTACT / JOIN THE TEAM / TERMS OF SERVICE / PRIVACY POLICY / COMMENT POLICY