Reader claims 9/11 was indeed a conspiracy - Baltimore Post-Examiner

Reader claims 9/11 was indeed a conspiracy

By · December 7, 2012 · 29 Comments
·
9-11-01-twin-towers (1)

Dear Editor,

This is in regards to your Post-Examiner article “General David Petreaus conspiracy solved.” If you were to actually look into the 9/11 affair, you would learn that it was very much a conspiracy indeed. The manner in which all THREE buildings each suddently collapsed into its footprints at nearly free-fall speed (on video) had to involve pre-planned controlled demolition, as over 1700 engineers and architects have attested (Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth )  No person who can think for himself and who becomes motivated into investigating the matter could believe otherwise.

Dozens of other connected explanatory facts all lead to the same conclusion: After learning well in advance of Bin Laden’s hijacking plans, from the Mossad, certain neocons in the administration and sympathizers carefully planned how to make it be successful and to be like a second Pearl Harbor.

The concensus is that Dick Cheney was in overall charge, in league with other neocons Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz. Quite a few others, mainly Zionists or Israeli supporter-extremists, were let in on only particular aspects of the overall job. E.g., Zionist Jeremy Kroll and his company were in charge of security at the World Trade Center, which Larry Silverstein had purchased early in the year and insured heavily against terrorism; afterwards he profited by over a billion. In my opinion, Pres. George Bush was in on very little of it.

At first glance it may indeed seem unthinkable that anyone in our administration would promote such a dastardly and horrendous deed. However, getting  fresh public support for beefing up our military, especially in the Middle East, and for attacking one or more of Israel’s enemies had top priority for some, and required a new Pearl Harbor. Besides misplaced patriotism being responsible for this conspiracy having been whitewashed and dismissed, there is also the continuing fear of false claims of anti-Semitism by the ADF and AIPAC  against  prominent investigators.

Sincerely,

Jim Deardorff
Research Professor emeritus
Oregon State University



About the author

Contact the author.
  • umbrarchist

    The 9/11 Affair is an issue of gravity just like the Galileo Affair. But now it is a dismal failure of scientists not a triumph of science. If airliners could destroy the towers in less than two hours then scientists should have explained it in good detail in 2002.

    Now the issue is not who did it but why scientists and engineering schools have no integrity. The Laws of Physics do not care about nationalism or money or people.

  • Chew

    Deardorff is the crackpot who fell for the photographs Billy Meier said was of aliens that turned out to be actresses on TV.

    • Albury Smith

      He does seem to have a little trouble distinguishing fantasy from reality and fact from fiction.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dan.plesse Dan Plesse

    9/11 Holocaust Story: Son Disintegrated
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLsTb0jvNMw

  • http://twitter.com/Hsaive Harold Saive

    Decide for yourself. Especially people who were too young to integrate this event at the time. You deserve to be informed about what millions of others have known for a decade….The facts and science about the deliberate demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7 have been translated into several languages available at http://ae911truth.org

    • http://www.facebook.com/dan.plesse Dan Plesse

      A&E only look at a very small keyhole of 9/11.

      For Example

      Thermite Fireballs will be covered up by A&E
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl8qnSGqx0k

      • Albury Smith

        All sizzle and no steak. The corners of the WTC towers weren’t even load-bearing, and chips of whatever in the dust could very well have been close in color to the flames shooting out of the NE corner of the South Tower, but so what? Few to no FDNY and others involved in the cleanup found anything suspicious, including Dr. Barnett, who’s featured in your video for some reason. Do all of those people need someone who wasn’t there to tell them what they saw?

    • Albury Smith

      Have they been translated into a language that the ASCE, NCSEA, SEAoNY, ICC, RIBA, AIA, and other established engineering and architectural organizations can understand? Gage and his cronies have neglected to enlighten them personally with his asinine dog-and-pony show at any of their conferences or conventions.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dan.plesse Dan Plesse

    9/11 High Temperature fires at Ground Zero, WTC7 – NIST FOIA sparks HTA fires 2001
    http://youtu.be/YP9ajOEt34I

    9/11 Engineering Students Discuss WTC Collapse Explosions
    http://youtu.be/_vS3k7fNtUc

    All Members of congress are Corrupt, hijacked and must sign an written oath to Israel
    http://youtu.be/795ZZH0emE0

    • Albury Smith

      You should post a copy of this alleged “written oath to Israel,” Dan, instead of just sharing the paranoid rantings of a former congresswoman. If high temperatures in debris fires are evidence to you of controlled demolition, please list some of the explosives or incendiaries that generate heat for more than ~5 minutes. Recorded temperatures of <1400F are considered pretty common for fires of that nature:

      http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/thermal.r09.html
      I didn't notice any mention of engineering studies by your alleged students, but looking at burning and collapsing hi-rises for a few minutes doesn't qualify as one.

      • http://www.facebook.com/dan.plesse Dan Plesse

        9/11 Explosions caused Bone Fractures version 2.01
        http://youtu.be/quwXO-JIuug

        Evidence of controlled cutting: for controlled demo

        Head to the NYPD Museum for more high temperature fire evidence.i.e melted concrete, hand guns trapped in concrete. or google it!
        http://911smokinggun.blogspot.com/2010/02/blog-post.html

        1400 and >1800 you got your greater sign wrong!

        Discussion included “while in Engineering class” check link inside about under video.

        Above Top Secret 20 MB SCAN of 9/11
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGSve5vGgZM

        • Albury Smith

          If you’ve discovered something that collapses huge buildings and then produces intense heat for months, our energy problems are as good as solved. If the eyewitnesses with bone fractures had heard demolition explosives, it’s unlikely that they’d have been around to tell us about it.

      • http://www.facebook.com/dan.plesse Dan Plesse

        X-rated 9/11 Architects and engineers Cover up
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl8qnSGqx0k

        If the Truthers think its over the top – it must be good!

        • Albury Smith

          Harrit, et al. could find “nanothermite” in a ham sandwich using the methodology described in their pay-to-publish Bentham fiasco, which concluded that common stuff “reminded” them of it while they provided no exemplars of anything for comparison. At ~1:30 here, he tells an Russia Today interviewer that “a hundred tons” or more of conventional high explosives were used in addition to what they were reminded of:
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bel9UeqnHi4
          Ever heard a fragmentation grenade go off? They contain ~8 ounces of conventional high explosive. I wouldn’t buy a used car from him or his colleagues.

  • dmhennen

    good work, but 90% of the american people, still see the world through blinders.

    • http://twitter.com/Hsaive Harold Saive

      I find that far more people are aware there is something wrong with the 9/11 story but just keep their mouth shut unless you bring it up.

  • Lee Eisenstein

    Bravo.

  • Albury Smith

    It’s very easy to prove. Just get some W14 X 730s (14WF730s) like the 11 used as columns in WTC 7′s core and the ones also used for some of the columns in both towers’ cores, stand them up, and demonstrate the secret explosive cutting of their 4.91″ flanges and 3.07″ webs, on video with sound. Even without the continuous steel plates welded across their flanges (or between them) in the lower levels of WTC 7, which added ~50% more cross sectional area and weight per foot, W14 X 730s weigh 730# per lineal foot and have 215 square-inch cross sections.
    If Richard Gage and his “1700 experts” were ever forced to do it, we’d never hear another peep out of them.
    note: the ~$4.68 billion total in damages that Silverstein collected from 12 different insurance companies fell billions short of his lost cash flow for years, and his mandatory rebuilding costs. Lloyd’s, Swiss Re, Zurich Financial, and Copenhagen Re were 4 of the companies which paid Silverstein Properties the multi-billion dollar settlement, and not one of them or the other 8 companies ever questioned why the buildings collapsed. Don’t they care as much as the 9/11 “truth movement,” or do they just like losing money?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1499546083 Michael Højgård Hansen

      http://911review.com/articles/ryan/nist_thermite_connection.html

      I would study this paper with an open mind…but I know you will not Albury.
      “living is easy with eyes closed, mistunderstanding all you see” John Lennon/Strawberry Fields

      • Albury Smith

        What paper should I study? All I saw was a letter from someone regurgitating nonsense from Gage and Griffin.

        • ColinB

          There were 47 vertical steel heat treated columns in each core of the WTC buildings. Each of them 1200mm x 385mm, 100mm thick at base and thinning to 30mm at top, (to allow for wind} Bolted together. YET, they just disintegrated when the the buildings ‘fell’. You are living in ‘I don’t want to know the truth’world.

          • Albury Smith

            Actually, I DO want to know the truth. Let’s see how explosives secretly cut “vertical steel heat treated” W14 X 730 columns – on video with sound. No columns “disintegrated” when any of the WTC buildings collapsed, but try that with explosives, incendiaries, nukes, space beams, or whatever else you can dream up.

          • http://www.facebook.com/dan.plesse Dan Plesse

            Albury bombs don’t cut steel. The requirements are many but the top two are: 1. cutting 2. movement. You got to get the buildings moving.

            9/11 seismology earthquake update
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDZlUItdbGo

            9/11 NEW Witness to explosions, Flight 11 witness, Flight 175 photo, Mossad 9-11 Photo 2012
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGSve5vGgZM

            Remember the Truth Movement will only get you 50% of the Truth, the rest you have to find yourself. Just get yourself a FOIA.

          • Albury Smith

            The 9/11 “truth movement” will get you about 0% of the truth, as you’ve amply demonstrated here. MD80s and DC9s don’t look anything at all like 767s, and the one in your video was nowhere near the WTC on 9/11. While you’re quote mining eyewitness statements for the word “explosion,” please feel free to narrow it down to the ones who claimed they heard demolition explosives and connected the sounds to any hi-rise collapse. Since many were FDNY, count the signatories to Erik Lawyer’s petition who even CLAIM to be FDNY:
            http://firefightersfor911truth.org/?page_id=469
            Guess they don’t care as much as you do about the deaths of 300+ of their colleagues, huh?

          • johnnywhittles

            Albury the more you talk the more you make the 911 truthers look extremely intelligent. Not that they aren’t intelligent to begin with. But it’s your stupidity that actually makes me think they’re onto something. Without idiots like you, people like me would never have come around.

          • Albury Smith

            Are you what’s left of the 9/11 “truth movement”?

    • Edgey Reason

      Wow, Albury Smith, you’re still at it? You know what the definition of insanity is, don’t you? So now you know better than even a veteran research professor? The gull of this man, people, witness it!

      Did you ever get around to starting that website? I searched and couldn’t find it. Still blogging and commenting out of your mom’s basement I see. Shame. I had such high hopes for you. Exactly how many hours of your life have you wasted debating strangers on this subject anyway?

      I do, however, commend your tenacity. It’s quite amazing that you still show up to the circus when ever “9/11 Truth” articles appear. Sure wish I could buy you a beer and pick your brain for an hour or two.

      Oh, and to those of you new to the likes of Albury Smith, he’s not to be messed with when it comes to 9/11 Truth. He’s the most ardent of researches on debunking that I’ve ever witnessed. There are literally hundreds and hundreds of posts from this guy, and he’s covered every angle – so don’t waste your time or keystrokes…it ain’t worth it.

      Best wishes, Albury. Keep up the “good” work. LOL!

      • Albury Smith

        I merely suggested to the veteran research professor and his sycophants here a very simple and straightforward way to support the secret explosive demolition hypothesis. It appears that I found a venue where I won’t be banned for having such “gull,” so it’s obviously not moderated by someone from your 9/11 “truth movement.”

  • ColinB

    Pretty much as the Professor says. And quite honestly that is easier to prove, because of available evidence, than for the conspiracists to disprove.

←
→

© 2013 Baltimore Post-Examiner

HOME / ABOUT / CONTACT / JOIN THE TEAM / TERMS OF SERVICE / PRIVACY POLICY